A study in moderation, misquotes, and why I still prefer coffee.

When I was younger — young — back when I was still brave enough to actually write in notebooks instead of hoarding them like endangered artefacts, I kept a book of quotes.
Lines I thought were cool, or clever, or profound. You might call them “edgy,” but that wasn’t really a word in the late 1900s. Back then, you could be deep or weird, and I was just a ginger from Liverpool.
On the very first page of that notebook, in my best dramatic handwriting, I wrote a quote I found online. A quote I was convinced was ancient, wise, and philosophical. A quote I believed Socrates himself had penned, probably while staring moodily into the middle distance.
It went like this:
“Moderation? It’s mediocrity, fear and confusion in disguise. It’s the devil’s dilemma. It’s neither doing nor not doing. It’s the wobbling compromise that makes no one happy. Moderation is for the bland, the apologetic, for the fence-sitters of the world afraid to take a stand. It’s for those afraid to laugh or cry, for those afraid to live or die. Moderation… is lukewarm tea, the devil’s own brew.”
— Not Socrates. Dan Millman.
At twelve years old, reading that? I thought I was the coolest thing alive.
I didn’t understand half of it, but it sounded intense, and I was absolutely certain a Greek philosopher had written it on a stone tablet or whatever.
Finding out years later that it wasn’t Socrates but Dan Millman, and that he wrote it in a book sold at Waterstones, was… humbling.
I’ve never read the book, but the quote stuck with me anyway. Partly because it’s dramatic in a way my teenage self adored, and partly because moderation actually is hard.
The Present Problem
Cut to now: a grown adult allegedly capable of responsibility, staring down the holiday season with the earnest hope of saving for an actual trip away. A real break. A proper escape. Something Future Me might thank Present Me for, if Future Me ever exists and isn’t replaced by an equally chaotic upgrade.
I want to be moderate. I do. I want to budget sensibly, make good choices, cook actual meals that don’t come in cardboard, and greet January with both memories and money. But moderation is so much harder than it sounds. Especially when December hits and executive function dissolves like a sugar cube in hot water.
This is the season where everything conspires to grind you down until you give in to hedonism. Suddenly every advert, every menu, every streetlight is whispering, “Go on. Treat yourself. You’ve earned it.”
And maybe I have. But treating myself often means opening a food delivery app with the resigned sigh of someone who knows very well that this is sabotage, but will do it anyway, because chewing joylessly on carrots doesn’t feel like survival.
The alternative isn’t noble, though. When I’m not giving in to hedonistic takeaways, I swing hard in the other direction.
Asceticism.
Punishment.
The monastic discipline of someone who has confused “stability” with “penance.”
Rice.
Instant ramen.
Vague resentment.
But it’s not balance. It’s a performance of self-control so dramatic that even my teenage “Socrates wrote that” self would roll her eyes.
And that’s the real problem: it is so easy to live at the extremes. To be all feast or famine, all indulgence or austerity.
Moderation requires something far more challenging:
making a reasonable decision when you’re tired, overwhelmed, overstimulated, and the algorithm is dangling a limited-time dessert pizza at you like a hostage negotiation.

The Pivot
It turns out the extremes, the feasting and the fasting, are easy because they’re emotional. They give you something to inhabit. A mood. A story. A posture.
Extravagance says:
“Screw it, you deserve joy.”
Asceticism says:
“Suffer now, thrive later.”
Moderation says:
“Make a sensible choice.”
And honestly? I hate it here.
Because moderation requires presence. Attention. Consistency. The kind of quiet, ongoing effort that never gets applause and never generates dopamine.

It’s showing up for a future self I don’t always believe in. It’s making decisions that feel small and mundane and unheroic.
It’s choosing not to dramatically overspend and not to dramatically punish myself for wanting things.
Moderation is boring, and boring is hard — especially for a brain that craves narrative arcs and emotional crescendos.
But boring is also where the real life happens.
Not the fantasy life, not the meltdown life… the actual life I have to live day by day. The life I’ll be living in five years, ten years, the one I’m squinting at in those pension calculators. The life where taking a holiday requires saving slowly, repeatedly, without drama.
Moderation is the tiny bridge between now and the future I keep insisting I want.
The Release
So I’ll practice moderation.
For now. For as long as I can manage.
Until, inevitably, extravagance or asceticism seduces me again… because they’re dramatic, and messy, and far more fun.
But I’ll keep trying. I’ll keep saving. I’ll keep choosing the middle path even when it tastes like nothing.
Moderation is lukewarm tea, and I’ll drink it…
but I’d rather have coffee.




